I have that exact pair of underwear... Hmm...
Indeed, I have seen some very good drawings which have used stock photographs. I sometimes use stock photographs as reference, but my drawing ends up looking completely different. I have also looked through the artist’s gallery and this is not his best piece, not so many of the others look quite as bad as this one.
This is not 50s Art, this is 50s: randywelborn.com/rw005.jpg And I do not see anything wrong with the colouring, shading or lighting because it is stylized. As for this piece, I do not think it is stylized; it just looks like a mess.
If it was intended to be a background, then why are the two men holding snowballs? Unless they are props, but then the snow on the right man’s jack is wet, as it is soaking through his jacket as you can see.
But Jester understand art, I know he does. He is an appreciator, like I said. Indeed, he does have some promising pieces in his gallery; he just needs to practice more.
I can be half sure, becuase for one he has not stated that he has used stock photographs unless they are his, like you aid before.
Ok, thank you. You are mature, unlike some other users on this site. I have been in arguments where it turns into insult slinging.
Indeed. But I guess they would wear tighter ones to make their arse look more attractive.
Wait... wtf did I just say?